Drug War

José de Córdoba (WSJ,sub):

The extradition of Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán, Mexico’s long-dominant drug lord, has led to an explosion of violence in his home state of Sinaloa, the birthplace of the country’s narcotics industry.

Rival factions are fighting over Mr. Guzmán’s billion-dollar empire as he awaits trial in solitary confinement inside a high-security prison in New York. He was extradited to the U.S. in January on drug-trafficking and murder charges.

So that’s the tradeoff against legalizing drugs. Gang violence with innocents killed.

Hear about the drug 0verdoses in the Cincinnati area lately? They have been linked to carfentanil and/or fentanyl, a “powerful painkiller ordinarily used to tranquilize elephants and other large animals.”

Both fentanyl and carfentanil have shown up in powder sold as heroin, either as a substitute or as an adjunct to highly diluted batches of the opiate.

Why is this stuff found in heroin and possibly other powders? Simple: prohibition makes heroin more expensive to produce and distribute, which encourages dilution with additives such as carfentanil and fentanyl.

Why are illegal drugs so fatal?

. . . . prohibition, which makes drug potency inconsistent and unreliable. In contrast with prescription pharmaceuticals or beverage alcohol, which are delivered in carefully measured and accurately labeled doses, black-market heroin is unpredictable and may not even be heroin at all.

. . .

But weaker heroin encourages users to take larger doses, a habit that may prove lethal when purity bounces back, and encourages dealers to compensate by adding boosters such as fentanyl and carfentanil. Meanwhile, the ongoing crackdown on painkillers encourages opioid users to switch from predictably potent pharmaceuticals to whatever’s in the packets sold by heroin dealers, which might be an elephant tranquilizer.



Last week’s convention was a wake for the GOP as we know it.

This week will be an explanation of why Hillary Clinton is

unacceptable not simply to libertarians but to that plurality of Americans who define themselves as independent, centrist, moderate, or anything other than a dyed-in-the-wool partisan.

On Federal Spending, Foreign Policy and State Surveillance, Free Speech, Social Issues, Immigration, Gun Rights, and Regulations, Trade, and the Sharing Economy, Hillary is just as much an authoritarian as The Donald.

Nick Gillespie.

Libertarian Party President/Vice President Ticket  Johnson/Weld pulls voters from both parties according to many polls.

Here’s a reason why J/W might pull from Democrats.

Thaya Brook Knight is associate director of financial regulation studies at the Cato institute. And she was profiled for a recent publication of Cato’s Letters. Ms. Knight was asked when she was first drawn to libertarian views. Her response:

I’ve always held libertarian views, although until recently I identified as a liberal Democrat. I believe in a strong First Amendment and strong protections for criminal defendants, I oppose the War on Drugs, and I support gay rights. In the wake of 9/11, I was horrified by the willingness to give up personal liberty in the name of safety. For a time, that meant my beliefs were aligned with the Democratic Party. But I’m also a feminist and it makes me angry when I’m told that, as a woman, I don’t know how to make my own choices or that I should be protected from their consequences, like a child. If we’re serious about equality, all adults must have the freedom and responsibility to order their lives as they see fit.

Highlights mine on what’s important to Ms. Knight. Hillary and many Democrats are attacking many of these issues or are recent converts. They’re also attacking our Due Process rights and Second Amendment rights.


A new argument has taken hold among gun control advocates, that gun control could reduce police violence.

Will it help? Nope.

No law will rid such communities of guns in one step. Disarming such communities, as with disarming any population, would require a significant amount of police force. . . .

Gun buybacks are popular but ineffective. (Australia’s buyback program and gun crackdown created a violent black market in guns—but anti-gun advocates who point to the ‘Australian model,’ as Obama and Hillary Clinton have, won’t mention that.) Lowering the number of firearms in circulation would require confiscation. It would mean no-knock raids, flashbang grenades, and other techniques popularized by the drug war, and more.

So, if you want a police state, sign on to this.


Although Nixon popularized the term “War on Drugs” when he first used it in 1971, the policies that his administration implemented as part of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 were a continuation of drug prohibition policies in the U.S. which stretched back to the year 1914.


MONTERREY, Mexico — Mexican President Felipe Calderon declared three days of mourning Friday following the arson of a casino by presumed drug traffickers that killed 52, calling those responsible “true terrorists.”


CHICAGO (MarketWatch) — Professional stock car driver Ronnie Hults has been suspended indefinitely by Nascar after testing positive for marijuana use, reports Denver’s KUSA-TV. Hults, who lives in Colorado, says he obtained the weed legally via a prescription for chronic pain. He told the station that that he only uses it “at night to sleep when my hips are on fire and I have back pain.” He also insisted that he is never high when he gets behind the wheel. Colorado is one of a growing number of states that permit residents to buy medical marijuana, with about 127,000 people currently holding valid prescription cards.

Here. This is stupid.  Would he get “behind the wheel” if he drank alcohol, aspirin, or some other chemical?  How about a sports drink?  Maybe, and I’m sure NASCAR has rules that govern what drivers can consume before or during a race.

Next Page »